Photographing a Year on Purpose

· 7 min read

Editing a year of photographs has one hard limit: you can only choose from what exists.

Everything else about making a book is recoverable. A bad crop can be redone, a weak sequence reshuffled, a dull cover swapped an hour before ordering. A photograph nobody took is the only unfixable thing in the whole process. It is worth looking for those gaps before the year passes.

So this is a piece about the other end of the work. Not choosing. Shooting, with a book in mind, at a cost of a few seconds, forty times a year.

What a camera roll is always short of

Four absences are worth checking in a family year, and none of them is about photographic skill.

The first is the place you actually lived. Imagine a year with 3,800 photographs and only nine of the house the family lived in that whole time: the hallway with the school bags in it, the kitchen at seven in the morning, the view from the front step, the sofa with the specific dent in it. Years later, the book has to work around having almost none of it.

The second is ordinary days. Cameras come out for occasions, so a year documents itself as a sequence of events and the finished book reads like a list of them. Birthdays, holidays, the school play, a wedding, repeat. Nobody remembers a year that way. What people remember is the texture between the events, and the texture is exactly what went unphotographed.

The third is whoever holds the phone. Usually one parent, absent from their own family’s record, present only in the handful of frames where somebody else happened to pick up a camera.

And the fourth is smaller but worth naming: people looking at each other rather than at the lens. A year of faces turned toward the camera reads as a year of portraits, however warm each one is.

Your own gaps, in twenty minutes

Those four are the common ones. Yours are specific, and you can find them tonight without making a book first.

Open last year and scroll one ordinary week, start to finish, including the days with nothing on them. Then search the roll for the rooms of your own house by name and see what comes back. Most people find the same thing: a dense archive of events with almost nothing around it, and one or two absences that are personal enough to sting a little. The walk everyone did every evening for a year. The grandmother who visited monthly and appears twice.

That is the list. It is usually five or six things long, and it does not need to be written down anywhere clever; it needs to be short enough to remember in the moment when the kitchen happens to look the way it always looks.

About forty photographs, taken on purpose

The size of the fix is smaller than it sounds.

It is not a photo-a-day project. Those ask for 365 decisions, stall around March, and the ones that do finish tend to produce a year of dutiful frames with nothing in them. What closes the gap is three or four photographs a month that you would not otherwise have taken. Call it forty a year.

The kitchen on a Tuesday at seven, before anyone tidies it. The drive everyone does twice a day, taken from the passenger seat. The same corner of the garden in February and again in July. Dinner as it actually looks, not arranged. The hallway. The bath. The bedroom floor with the entire contents of a toy box on it.

These can survive the edit for a mechanical reason. Twelve versions of the birthday candles compete with each other, and eleven of them lose. The one photograph of the hallway competes with nothing.

There is one technical thing worth carrying into all of this, and it is not about the camera. It is light. A recent phone will fill a full page of a printed book perfectly well in decent light and fall apart in a dim room, because low light is what actually costs a photograph its detail in print. So move the person a step toward the window instead of reaching for the flash, and take the indoor photos earlier in the evening than feels natural. That single habit does more for a year of photographs than any setting on the phone.

The least interesting photograph of the day

There is one habit worth borrowing from documentary work, and it is the least interesting photograph you will take all day.

When something starts, take one wide frame of the whole scene. The room before the party. The beach on arrival, including the car park. The restaurant table before the food comes. The hotel corridor at midnight.

Every reader of a photo book silently asks where were we, and no close-up answers it. A chapter that opens on a wide frame is legible immediately; a chapter that opens on a child’s face mid-laugh is lovely and slightly unplaced. One per event is plenty, and you will not enjoy taking any of them.

Hand the camera over

The missing parent is the absence people feel hardest and the only one that cannot be solved later. There is nothing in the pile to choose from.

Two things fix it at the point of capture. Once a month, ask somebody for one photograph of you doing an ordinary thing: cooking, carrying a child, asleep on the sofa with a book collapsed on your chest. Not posed in front of a landmark. Ordinary.

The other is to hand the phone to a six-year-old far more often than seems sensible. The horizon will tilt, the framing will be wild, half the frames will be of the floor. They will also be the only photographs in the year taken from the height your child actually lives at, looking up at the adults, and at least one of them will end up in the book.

The frame you take every year

One of the forty is worth repeating on purpose.

Pick a photograph you can take again in twelve months: the same doorway with whoever is small standing in it, the same view from the same window, the same three people on the same step, the pencil marks on the door frame. Take it in the same month each year, roughly from the same place, and do not try to improve it.

On its own it is a dull photograph. In the fourth year it is the best thing in the book, because it is the only page where change is visible rather than implied. Nothing else in a family archive does that, and it costs four seconds annually.

This is the cheapest thing on the list and the one people regret not starting sooner, which is a good reason to start it in an unremarkable month rather than waiting for a January.

Staying in the room

The real risk of shooting on purpose is becoming the person behind the camera, half-present at everything, and that is a worse outcome than a thin year of photographs.

Three habits keep it small. Take the photograph in the first ten seconds and then put the phone away, because the good frame is nearly always early, before anyone has noticed. One frame, not eleven. And if you catch yourself arranging people, stop, because a photograph of people being arranged looks precisely like that and no edit can rescue it.

The burst habit is the expensive one. Eleven frames of the same moment collapse to a single photograph in any book, and Enchanta will do that collapsing without being asked, so the other ten were never going to print. What they cost was the two minutes you spent looking at a screen while the thing you were photographing carried on without you.

An illustrative year

Imagine a family with 3,800 photographs from one year. They choose 70 for a book. The figures below illustrate how a few deliberate photographs might change the edit; they do not describe a real family’s book.

In that imagined first book, three absences stand out. The flat they moved out of in March appears twice, both times by accident, one of those with a removal box across half the frame. There is no photograph of the father holding the baby that was not posed for. And there is no weekday in the book at all, because there were barely any weekdays in the pile.

In the example’s following year, the family takes roughly the same number of photos, but adds forty deliberate frames across twelve months. The hallway in October. The kitchen at breakfast, four times, in four seasons. The drive to school. A Wednesday.

Suppose the second book has 74 photographs and 26 came from the deliberate forty. Those frames give the ordinary days a place alongside the occasions.

Why they win

Deliberate photographs can survive the cut even when they are not the most polished frames.

The hallway may be the only frame of the place where the year happened.

Questions people ask

What should I photograph that I am probably not photographing?
The rooms you live in, ordinary weekdays, and yourself. Camera rolls are rich in occasions and almost empty of the hallway, the Tuesday dinner, the drive, and the parent who holds the phone. Those are the photos a book wants and cannot find.
Is a photo-a-day project worth doing?
For most families, no. It asks for 365 decisions and usually stops in March, and the ones that finish produce volume rather than a book. Three or four deliberate photos a month is a smaller commitment that survives.
How do I get into the photos when I am always the one taking them?
Ask, once a month, for one photo of you doing something ordinary, and hand the phone to a child more often than feels sensible. A timer propped against a jar counts too. This cannot be fixed at selection time, because there is nothing to select.
Do phone photos print well enough for a photo book?
Yes, at the sizes most photo books use. The failures are light, not hardware: a dim room and a long digital zoom produce files that fall apart when printed large. Given reasonable light, a recent phone will hold a full page.
How many photos should I take at one event?
Fewer than you do. One frame per moment, and move on. A burst of eleven is a way of postponing the choice, and the book will keep one of them anyway, so the other ten cost you the minutes you spent not being there.

Related reading